Most helpful client reviews
173 of 175 humans found the following review helpful.
Excellent Overview. Belongs on Your Bookshelf.
By Michael Wischmeyer
Howard Eves presents this five-star story of mathematics as two intertwined threads: one describes the growing content of mathematics and the other the altering nature of mathematics. In exploring these two elements, Eves has invented a outstanding book for the layman. I find myself returning to his book again and again.
My few semesters of calculus, differential equations, and other employed math failed to formally introduce me to abstract algebras, non-Euclidian geometries, projective geometry, symbolic logic, and mathematical philosophy. I in general considered algebra and geometry to be singular nouns. Howard Eves corrected my grammar.
"Foundations and Fundamental Concepts" is not a traditionalisti history of mathematics, but an investigation of the philosophical context in which new developments emerged. Eves paints a clear picture of the critical ideas and turning points in mathematics and he does so without calling for substantial mathematics by the reader. Calculus is not required.
The initial two chapters, titled "Mathematics Before Euclid" and "Euclid's Elements", consider the origin of mathematics and the noteworthy development of the Greek axiomatic method that overshadowed mathematics for almost 2000 years.
In chapter three Eves introduces non-Euclidian geometry. Mathematics is transformed from an empirical method concentered on describing our real, three-dimensional world to a originative endeavor that manufactures new, abstract geometries.
This discussion of geometries, as opposed to geometry, proceeds in chapter four. The key topics include Hilbert's highly influential work that placed Euclidian geometry on a firm (but more abstract) postulational basis, Poincaire's model and the consistency of Lobachevskian geometry, the principle of duality in projective geometry, and Decartes development of analytic geometry. For the non-initiated these topics may seem daunting, but Eves' approach is clear and rather fascinating.
Chapter five, which might have been titled "The Liberation of Algebra", may at firstborn be a bit overpowering to those incognizant of algebraic structures like groups, rings, and fields. But take console as even mathematicians in the early nineteenth century still considered algera to be little more than symbolized arithmetic. As Eves says, non-Euclidian geometry freed the "invisible shackles of Euclidian geometry". Likewise, abstract algebra devised a parallel revolution. (Again, don't be intimidated by the terminology. Eves is rather good.)
The remaining four chapters look at the axiomatic foundation of innovative mathematics, the real number system, set theory, and at last mathematical logic and philosophy. Eves concludes with the surprising invention of contradictions within Cantor's set theory as well as Hilbert's not successful crusade to define procedures to keep out of the way of inconsistencies or contradictions within an axiomatic system.
Eves mentions Godel's rudimentary contribution to mathematical logic, but stops short of delving into Godel's Proof. For further and added reading I highly commend "Godel's Proof" by Ernest Nagel and James R. Newman.
I likewise highly commend Richard Courant's and Herbert Robbins' classic, "What is Mathematics?", a more elaborate examination of the development of rudimentary ideas and methods underlying mathematics. I would suggest that most readers, peculiarly non-math majors, introductory read Eves and later tackle Courant and Robbins.
I have read "Foundations and Fundamentals of Mathematics" at least twice. I gave my son a copy for Christmas. He says that the book is great and he even claims to be reading it as he walks all over his campus amongst classes. The price is great. It belongs in your book collection.
149 of 151 humans found the following review helpful.
Ecellent description of the history of mathematical thinking
By Juergen Kahrs
There are various books available on the history of mathematics. Some give an account on the development of a sure area, others focus on a group of persons and a lot of do hardly more than story telling. I was looking for one that tells the story of the development of the main ideas and the understanding of what mathematics and science in general is (or what people thought it is and must be). Howard Eves' book is the firstborn book I purchased that gives me the answers I was looking for. Starting with pre-Euclidean fragments, going on with Euclid, Aristotle and the Pythagoreans, straight to non-Euclidean geometry it focuses on the axiomatic method of geometry. What pleased me most here is that the author actually takes each epoch for serious. He quotes longer (and well chosen) passages from Euclid, Aristotle and Proclus to demonstrate their approaches. Each chapter ends with a Problems section. I was amazed to see how much these difficultnesses disclose of the epoch, it is difficulties and thinking.
The book goes on with chapters on Hilbert's Grundlagen, Algebraic Structure etc, always showing not only the substance of these periods but also the shift in the way of thinking and the development towards rigor. The last chapter is titled Logic and Philosophy. Eves divides "contemporary" philosophies of mathematics into three schools: logistic (Russel/Whitehead), intuitionist (Brouwer) and the formalist (Hilbert).
The book ends with galore interesting appendices on specific difficultnesses like the primary propositions of Euclid, nonstandard analysis and even Gödel's incompleteness theorem. Bibliography, solutions to chosen difficulties and an index are conservatively prepared to round up an splendid book.
Should you buy this book ? Yes. What kind of fault may you make in spending US$ 12.95 on a book that has withstood the test of time through three editions (each with a dissimilar publisher). I have not finished reading the book yet, but I do not regret having purchased it.
56 of 61 people found the following review helpful.
'Swiss Army Knife' of Upper Level Mathematics
By A
I altogether agree with the former two reviewers on what they had to say with regards to this fantasti book. However, I did want to briefly note that -- beyond plainly being a arousing and attention holding overview of the development of beyond-calculus mathematics -- it is likewise a great resource for persons requiring to look up or review topics in progressed mathematics (especially mathematical logic). Again, to repeat what the others have said, buy this book if you have ANY interest in mathematics. You won't regret it.
See all 10 client reviews...
|
Posted in swiss
